You are here
Home ›USA: Unions Welcome the New Boss
As seen above, leaders from the building trades unions posed for pictures with the new President. The operating belief among these union leaders is that they will profit, as petty-capitalists, from hypothetical future national infrastructure projects. The leadership of the AFL-CIO came out in support of the new regime's trade warfare policies. The unions have dug up their own “Buy American” slogan that they coined in the 1970s. As a national chauvinist and patriotic slogan it fits in nicely with the “America First” line of the new lords of Pennsylvania Avenue.
This comes as no surprise. The machinery of the AFL-CIO has always supported a nationalist and pro-war line. The AFL-CIO supported the Iraq War and every war before it. Through the American Institute for Free Labor Development (AIFLD), the AFL-CIO partnered with the CIA and CIA front organizations to pursue the imperialist aims of the regime in Washington. For the unions this activity outlasted the demise of the USSR. Eventually the AIFLD was rolled into to a new bureaucracy called the “American Center for International Labor Solidarity”.
While the trade warfare policy harms workers who lose their earnings to price inflation and then lose their lives in the wars that often follow, for a bourgeoisie desperate to suck capital into their national hole it might seem worthwhile. Capitalism must "expand or die" (Marx). The nationalist outlook of the unions fits neatly with the nationalist outlook of the political leadership. For union leaderships in the building trades, any policy that keeps the building boom going is a good policy. For the bourgeoisie keeping building boom going makes the economy appear healthier than it actually is, it ties values down into bank debt. For the unions this is a survival adaptation to the new reality in Washington. For the politicians it is an attempt to appeal to nationalist sentiments in the population and to “blue collar” workers in particular. The social base of the ruling parties is evaporating forcing the Republican Party to incorporate fascist elements into the ruling coalition. The ruling party needs allies just as much as the union leaderships do. The nationalist campaign on trade and in support of domestic industry is perfectly in line with all previous US policy. From one President's platitudes of “insourcing” to another President's “America First” and “Buy American” the end result is the same.
During the last Presidential election campaign the most popular candidates made visits to the iron range in Northeastern Minnesota to call for protectionist trade measures against China. The bourgeoisie, across their political spectrum, wants the long term slide in commodity prices worldwide to be viewed as entirely the fault of China. The same political class in Senate Intelligence Committee hearings on March 31, blamed all the social protests of the last decade on the insidious effects of Russian "information warfare". [1] A witch-hunting atmosphere exists that is aiming to use the political crisis of the administration to push it towards an even more aggressively militaristic agenda and not to protect the public against repression and austerity. The regime in D.C. has drawn up a list of political commentary web sites officially regarded as being in the service of a Russian state propaganda machine. The squabbling factions of the bourgeoisie appear as opponents of each other when they are only walking the same path of imperialist war, walking down the same road arguing with each other about who should be on their hit lists. [2]
The old argument that revolutionaries cannot abandon the workers in the unions to their reactionary leaderships isn't appropriate to a situation where the unions choose to abandon the workers. According to a Pew Research poll six in ten adults in the US have a favorable view towards unions. [3] The business union in capitalism responds to their decline in exactly the same way the capitalists in control of any industry would react, to cut out the dead wood and increase costs onto the backs of their member-workers. To argue today about what revolutionaries should do in regard to unions is akin to arguing about where to stand at the bedside of the terminally ill.
As state workers unions lose automatic dues check-offs, and each individual state adopts anti-union measures such as “right to work” legislation, the unionized sector of the workforce hemorrhages a little more. The current rate of unionization is now down to 10.7% of the workforce in the US, this is down from 20% in 1983 and down from 34.8% in 1954. [4] This is what the construction trades, the teamsters and the steel workers union leaderships are facing. What the ruling class is attacking when it attacks the unions is the base of a rival faction of the ruling class and not simply the wages and working conditions of the workers as members of the unions. The only thing about the executives of the unions that differs from the executive of a company is the word "union". The long collapse in members of the unions simply makes them more willing to negotiate the sale of labor power and make concessions to their colleagues.
The state government of Iowa has just ended the automatic dues check-off for their state unions and have stopped bargaining with their state workers unions. The unions in Rockford, Illinois public schools have called out a short strike to get workers to blow off steam and to push an inevitable sellout contract afterwards. Meanwhile the state workers' union, AFSCME in Illinois passed a resolution to carry out a strike vote in the near future if they feel the need to get workers to blow off steam during the bargaining process with the state. The union is currently pursuing a strategy of litigation. In neighboring states around Illinois the state workers unions have been crushed. This is precisely what all the remaining unions are looking at and hoping to avoid, but they seek to do so without having angry workers make things difficult for them. No matter the humiliation union officialdom must keep its seat at the bargaining table regardless of who is sitting at that table with them. The union must bargain a contract or perish.
The sort of unions workers consistently show support for in polls don't exist. Specifically perception of a union as an organization of workers who band together to wage the day-to-day "guerrilla" struggle against the employing class or that at the very least attempts to fight for workers interests at some level. The reality of a union that is nothing more than an organization of a faction of bourgeoisie connected to one ruling clique or another is difficult to understand for those who have not seen it. They gain what credibility they have to workers from the very fact that the state attacks them. The state attacks because the crisis compels the capitalists to make sure there are few seats at the table. During more prosperous times, when workers are inclined to ask for more the capitalists might use a union to ameliorate the exploitation with the help of an union during the upswing in the last cycle of accumulation. With the downwards phase of the cycle the capitalist class must claw back from workers as much as possible and make them bleed. There is little sense in attempts to revive or recreate these institutions when workers must circumvent these institutions and seek to move beyond their inherent sectional and national limitations. All our past experience tells us that today the basic proletarian organizational forms are workers assemblies with mandated and recallable delegates, making decisions and waging our struggles out in the open on our own terrain. [5]
ASm
4 April 2017
Notes
[1] Contrary to the title there was nothing new, only the usual assertions of the spymasters in the Senate.
Posner, S. Today’s Russia hearings actually revealed something new and important. Washington Post. March 30, 2016.
[2] For an expansion on this see leftcom.org
[3] Maniam, S. Most Americans See Labor Unions and Corporations Favorably. Pew Research Center. 2016
[4] Mayer, G. Union membership trends in the United States. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service. 2004
[5] For a fuller outline of our position see leftcom.org
Start here...
- Navigating the Basics
- Platform
- For Communism
- Introduction to Our History
- CWO Social Media
- IWG Social Media
- Klasbatalo Social Media
- Italian Communist Left
- Russian Communist Left
The Internationalist Communist Tendency consists of (unsurprisingly!) not-for-profit organisations. We have no so-called “professional revolutionaries”, nor paid officials. Our sole funding comes from the subscriptions and donations of members and supporters. Anyone wishing to donate can now do so safely using the Paypal buttons below.
ICT publications are not copyrighted and we only ask that those who reproduce them acknowledge the original source (author and website leftcom.org). Purchasing any of the publications listed (see catalogue) can be done in two ways:
- By emailing us at uk@leftcom.org, us@leftcom.org or ca@leftcom.org and asking for our banking details
- By donating the cost of the publications required via Paypal using the “Donate” buttons
The CWO also offers subscriptions to Revolutionary Perspectives (3 issues) and Aurora (at least 4 issues):
- UK £15 (€18)
- Europe £20 (€24)
- World £25 (€30, $30)
Take out a supporter’s sub by adding £10 (€12) to each sum. This will give you priority mailings of Aurora and other free pamphlets as they are produced.
ICT sections
Basics
- Bourgeois revolution
- Competition and monopoly
- Core and peripheral countries
- Crisis
- Decadence
- Democracy and dictatorship
- Exploitation and accumulation
- Factory and territory groups
- Financialization
- Globalization
- Historical materialism
- Imperialism
- Our Intervention
- Party and class
- Proletarian revolution
- Seigniorage
- Social classes
- Socialism and communism
- State
- State capitalism
- War economics
Facts
- Activities
- Arms
- Automotive industry
- Books, art and culture
- Commerce
- Communications
- Conflicts
- Contracts and wages
- Corporate trends
- Criminal activities
- Disasters
- Discriminations
- Discussions
- Drugs and dependencies
- Economic policies
- Education and youth
- Elections and polls
- Energy, oil and fuels
- Environment and resources
- Financial market
- Food
- Health and social assistance
- Housing
- Information and media
- International relations
- Law
- Migrations
- Pensions and benefits
- Philosophy and religion
- Repression and control
- Science and technics
- Social unrest
- Terrorist outrages
- Transports
- Unemployment and precarity
- Workers' conditions and struggles
History
- 01. Prehistory
- 02. Ancient History
- 03. Middle Ages
- 04. Modern History
- 1800: Industrial Revolution
- 1900s
- 1910s
- 1911-12: Turko-Italian War for Libya
- 1912: Intransigent Revolutionary Fraction of the PSI
- 1912: Republic of China
- 1913: Fordism (assembly line)
- 1914-18: World War I
- 1917: Russian Revolution
- 1918: Abstentionist Communist Fraction of the PSI
- 1918: German Revolution
- 1919-20: Biennio Rosso in Italy
- 1919-43: Third International
- 1919: Hungarian Revolution
- 1930s
- 1931: Japan occupies Manchuria
- 1933-43: New Deal
- 1933-45: Nazism
- 1934: Long March of Chinese communists
- 1934: Miners' uprising in Asturias
- 1934: Workers' uprising in "Red Vienna"
- 1935-36: Italian Army Invades Ethiopia
- 1936-38: Great Purge
- 1936-39: Spanish Civil War
- 1937: International Bureau of Fractions of the Communist Left
- 1938: Fourth International
- 1940s
- 1960s
- 1980s
- 1979-89: Soviet war in Afghanistan
- 1980-88: Iran-Iraq War
- 1982: First Lebanon War
- 1982: Sabra and Chatila
- 1986: Chernobyl disaster
- 1987-93: First Intifada
- 1989: Fall of the Berlin Wall
- 1979-90: Thatcher Government
- 1980: Strikes in Poland
- 1982: Falklands War
- 1983: Foundation of IBRP
- 1984-85: UK Miners' Strike
- 1987: Perestroika
- 1989: Tiananmen Square Protests
- 1990s
- 1991: Breakup of Yugoslavia
- 1991: Dissolution of Soviet Union
- 1991: First Gulf War
- 1992-95: UN intervention in Somalia
- 1994-96: First Chechen War
- 1994: Genocide in Rwanda
- 1999-2000: Second Chechen War
- 1999: Introduction of euro
- 1999: Kosovo War
- 1999: WTO conference in Seattle
- 1995: NATO Bombing in Bosnia
- 2000s
- 2000: Second intifada
- 2001: September 11 attacks
- 2001: Piqueteros Movement in Argentina
- 2001: War in Afghanistan
- 2001: G8 Summit in Genoa
- 2003: Second Gulf War
- 2004: Asian Tsunami
- 2004: Madrid train bombings
- 2005: Banlieue riots in France
- 2005: Hurricane Katrina
- 2005: London bombings
- 2006: Anti-CPE movement in France
- 2006: Comuna de Oaxaca
- 2006: Second Lebanon War
- 2007: Subprime Crisis
- 2008: Onda movement in Italy
- 2008: War in Georgia
- 2008: Riots in Greece
- 2008: Pomigliano Struggle
- 2008: Global Crisis
- 2008: Automotive Crisis
- 2009: Post-election crisis in Iran
- 2009: Israel-Gaza conflict
- 2020s
- 1920s
- 1921-28: New Economic Policy
- 1921: Communist Party of Italy
- 1921: Kronstadt Rebellion
- 1922-45: Fascism
- 1922-52: Stalin is General Secretary of PCUS
- 1925-27: Canton and Shanghai revolt
- 1925: Comitato d'Intesa
- 1926: General strike in Britain
- 1926: Lyons Congress of PCd’I
- 1927: Vienna revolt
- 1928: First five-year plan
- 1928: Left Fraction of the PCd'I
- 1929: Great Depression
- 1950s
- 1970s
- 1969-80: Anni di piombo in Italy
- 1971: End of the Bretton Woods System
- 1971: Microprocessor
- 1973: Pinochet's military junta in Chile
- 1975: Toyotism (just-in-time)
- 1977-81: International Conferences Convoked by PCInt
- 1977: '77 movement
- 1978: Economic Reforms in China
- 1978: Islamic Revolution in Iran
- 1978: South Lebanon conflict
- 2010s
- 2010: Greek debt crisis
- 2011: War in Libya
- 2011: Indignados and Occupy movements
- 2011: Sovereign debt crisis
- 2011: Tsunami and Nuclear Disaster in Japan
- 2011: Uprising in Maghreb
- 2014: Euromaidan
- 2016: Brexit Referendum
- 2017: Catalan Referendum
- 2019: Maquiladoras Struggle
- 2010: Student Protests in UK and Italy
- 2011: War in Syria
- 2013: Black Lives Matter Movement
- 2014: Military Intervention Against ISIS
- 2015: Refugee Crisis
- 2018: Haft Tappeh Struggle
- 2018: Climate Movement
People
- Amadeo Bordiga
- Anton Pannekoek
- Antonio Gramsci
- Arrigo Cervetto
- Bruno Fortichiari
- Bruno Maffi
- Celso Beltrami
- Davide Casartelli
- Errico Malatesta
- Fabio Damen
- Fausto Atti
- Franco Migliaccio
- Franz Mehring
- Friedrich Engels
- Giorgio Paolucci
- Guido Torricelli
- Heinz Langerhans
- Helmut Wagner
- Henryk Grossmann
- Karl Korsch
- Karl Liebknecht
- Karl Marx
- Leon Trotsky
- Lorenzo Procopio
- Mario Acquaviva
- Mauro jr. Stefanini
- Michail Bakunin
- Onorato Damen
- Ottorino Perrone (Vercesi)
- Paul Mattick
- Rosa Luxemburg
- Vladimir Lenin
Politics
- Anarchism
- Anti-Americanism
- Anti-Globalization Movement
- Antifascism and United Front
- Antiracism
- Armed Struggle
- Autonomism and Workerism
- Base Unionism
- Bordigism
- Communist Left Inspired
- Cooperativism and autogestion
- DeLeonism
- Environmentalism
- Fascism
- Feminism
- German-Dutch Communist Left
- Gramscism
- ICC and French Communist Left
- Islamism
- Italian Communist Left
- Leninism
- Liberism
- Luxemburgism
- Maoism
- Marxism
- National Liberation Movements
- Nationalism
- No War But The Class War
- PCInt-ICT
- Pacifism
- Parliamentary Center-Right
- Parliamentary Left and Reformism
- Peasant movement
- Revolutionary Unionism
- Russian Communist Left
- Situationism
- Stalinism
- Statism and Keynesism
- Student Movement
- Titoism
- Trotskyism
- Unionism
Regions
User login
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.